Categories
Uncategorized

Craven in childbirth

The November 21 1931 edition of the Toronto Daily Star contained this rather startling article about women and childbirth.

It appears that Dr. John S. Fairbairn of St. Thomas’ Hospital in London believed that middle-class British women were unwilling to suffer during childbirth and did not believe that motherhood was a duty. This apparently made it their own fault that they died more often during the delivery process. (Dr. Fairbairn, needless to say, was male.)

A Google search for Dr. Fairbairn turned up this obituary for him; he passed away in 1944. The obituary listed his medical achievements and honours but did not mention his viewpoint on maternal suffering.

Categories
Uncategorized

Ukelele surprise

I included this bit of filler from the February 18 1927 edition of the Toronto Daily Star because it was a bit unusual.

IMG_6011

I suspect that Mr. Watson was not invited to any future surprise parties.

Categories
Uncategorized

Gosh

Here’s an ad from the June 11 1947 Toronto Daily Star that’s just plain weird:

IMG_3162.jpg

What’s weirdest about this ad is that Abbey’s Effervescent Salt is actually a laxative, though the ad copy doesn’t mention it directly – it just says that Abbey’s “acts gently, effectively”. I’m not sure whether a laxative is the best remedy for overindulging, but then I’m not a medical doctor, am I?

Compare this ad to one that appeared in the April 8 1940 Toronto Daily Star, which went straight to the point:

IMG_0685.jpg

Abbey’s Effervescent Salt had been around since the 19th century. The company published a book in 1898 titled Abbey’s Effervescent Salt: The Foundation of Health.

Wikipedia has a generic entry on fruit salts – Abbey’s was apparently created as a competitor to Eno’s Fruit Salt.

Categories
Uncategorized

Probably not a good idea

From the February 8 1945 edition of the Toronto Daily Star:

IMG_0909

Perhaps the prisoner wanted to create a tunnel in which to hide the $60 watch.

Categories
Uncategorized

E7-55

Here’s an article from the November 2 1966 Toronto Daily Star that made my jaw drop:

IMG_0330

I had no idea that they used to number the indigenous Canadians who lived in the north – how demeaning is that? Did they actually ever address him as “E7-55”?

I’m not sure when the word “Eskimo” stopped being used officially. Wikipedia informs me that the term was originally used by the Algonquin tribes to refer to their northern neighbours, and that the Inuit never referred to themselves this way.